
SUBMITTED BY ANOMIE:Here’s an interesting fact: Did you know table skirts were invented to prevent any “unnatural” unions between men and furniture?
This is because legs (limbs in general?) were considered to be so sexy that men just couldn’t resist. Even if the leg was wooden and connected to a tabletop. Oooh baby.
But have we really changed that much since the Victorian Era? After all, under the current administration women are required to wear pantyhose. Well, at least we’re directing our attention to human legs, now.
Or are we? Anyone know whether Bush also covered all the tables with skirts?
On the bright side, Bush the First made women wear knee-length skirts and pantyhose. At least Junior’s administration allows pants. Just as long as them legs are covered, right?
I am reminded of a movie (what was that movie?) in which a man walks in on a topless woman from another culture. In his culture, breasts are quite sexually arousing. In her culture, backs are. She freaks out and hides her back, exposing her breasts in the process. The man is pleased, albeit confused.
I am also reminded of the time my daughter, upon being seen in nothing but her undies, ripped the undies off in horror and flung them aside. Because nobody was supposed to see her underwear.
How much does time and space influence that which we find arousing? Even our sexualities – something many like to say is completely innate – are influenced by culture. Do you really think it’s a coincidence that
1. women are so completely sexualized in our society (especially in the media)
AND
2. there are far more self-identified bisexual women than there are bisexual men?
Just sayin’.
Hey – get away from that table leg! Damn perverts.
Comments
I think table skirts were actually invented to allow for private handjobs.
May 9th, 2008 at 2:06 pmI thought table skirts were invented by artists because it’s a lot harder to draw everyones’ and the table’s legs than to just draw a piece of clothe in the way.
May 9th, 2008 at 2:23 pmfunny how the table skirt ended up promoting a very different sort of union
May 9th, 2008 at 6:47 pmpersonally i think they’re silly; but these days they serve mainly to keep any skirt-wearing ladies’ dignity intact, especially when there’s a panel up on a stage. also good in this sense for scratchers–and their dignity.
May 10th, 2008 at 9:08 pmIs there any sort of reference for this article? I’m sorry, it’s a little strange for me to buy without any sources.
May 12th, 2008 at 6:09 pmThe reference came from the History Channel’s History of Sex. I don’t know where they got their information.
May 13th, 2008 at 7:02 amLeave a reply :