Eliminate Panty Lines With The C-String
Ladies, do you love your g-string… except for the nasty panty lines created by the strings on the sides? Consider the c-string, a c-shaped undergarment that promises “No Panty Lines! No Tan Lines!”… and doesn’t look particularly comfortable (but hey, who cares? No panty lines!!).
What we’d really like to see is some kind of undergarment turns the back section into a prong that’s vaginally inserted, and held up solely by the strength of your PC muscles. An undergarment that helps with your Kegels? Brilliant! Alternately, there could be a, uh, back-end version that’s an undergarment/butt plug.
Man, we should patent these ideas, stat.
[Via Naked City]
-
What is Boinkology?
Insightful analysis of sex, relationships, dating - and everything in between.
-
Most Discussed:
The Ladies Of Liberty City
Does The World Need More Porn For Straight Women?
Gentlemen Prefer A Size 12
Attention WalMart Shoppers, Masturbation Is Not Allowed On the Premises
The Case Of Facials Vs. Butt Sex
What's The Least Sexy Word For Penis?
Woman Has A Baby With Her Own Father
Contest: Bi Any Other Name
Girls With Tattoos = Guaranteed Butt Sex?
Cleanshaven Men Get More Play
RSS
Comments
Except it’s black so that in situations of pantie lines really showing (White and tan pants) instead everyone will think they are seeing a dark blotch from your pubes…
June 19th, 2008 at 10:55 amRobosheep:
It comes in many colors, not just black.
June 19th, 2008 at 11:21 amat that point, why even wear underwear? or, i don’t know… stop wearing super tight pants. i mean, there are ways around this guys. who is THAT annoyed with a panty line, anyway? obviously a man created this item.
oh wait.. two men created this item. i feel so embarrassed when i’m wrong.
June 19th, 2008 at 11:26 amLux is correct, in twelve different colors/patterns there are more than just black, you can also get it in bright blood red for example.
June 19th, 2008 at 11:52 amI imagine the buttplug version would be rather more secure… What’s wrong with going commando? If you’re not into that for whatever reason then this does seem like a rather complicated solution!
Haha it’s entertaining me trying to work out how well it’d stay in one place though…
June 19th, 2008 at 12:22 pmYour vag and/or buttplug thong idea would make a good discipline (master/slave) toy. “You’ve been bad, you get to wear the plug panties!”
June 19th, 2008 at 12:47 pmEven better if they put a nice clit friendly ridge down the inside side made of some soft but frictiontastic material. Tight jeans and a brisk walk, perfect.
June 19th, 2008 at 1:04 pmI have to agree here with Brookebomber… Just go commando. Looks like a solution in need of a problem. It is funny though.
June 19th, 2008 at 4:24 pmThat looks like the most uncomfortable thing man has ever created. Ack.
June 19th, 2008 at 5:36 pmWhat if fell off while you were dancing?
June 19th, 2008 at 7:52 pmFumbling around for your weirdly shaped underwear in the middle of a club – sexy.
[...] mAS aQUI [...]
June 20th, 2008 at 6:59 amOkay, I love the kegel version. Think of the vaginal-exercise DVD tie-in. Ladies, did you do your workout today?
June 20th, 2008 at 2:37 pmStill, while not hanging awkwardly between your legs I bet it would make a great back scratcher!
June 20th, 2008 at 9:04 pmThe kegel idea sounds useful
But i’m just curious..how do you clean this “C-String”??
June 22nd, 2008 at 8:15 pmyou could just put a pad in your tight pants. i mean, the only reason i can see for these underpants (i refuse to use the p word) would be if you were afraid of staining your pants with massive ovulatoes.
that said, i don’t even understand g strings. pantylines don’t really bother me. why do i want people to think i’m not wearing underwear when i -am- wearing underwear? if i want people to think i’m not wearing underwear, i just won’t.
June 25th, 2008 at 9:25 pmWhat’s wrong with going commando is that the female genitalia is very sensitive, particularly to abrasive fabrics. Keeping a breathable cotton strip in that area prevents UTIs and yeast infections. Wearing tight jeans without that cotton strip is abrasive and can cause health problems, which, if goes untreated or done regularly, can cause chronic health problems, even in some extreme cases as interfering with fertility.
But wearing tight pants regularly in general also cause health problems, whether you have the cotton in place or not.
Also, women do secrete fluids at various times, and the last thing a woman wants is to stand up and have there be a wet spot on the back of her dress or on the couch she was sitting on. If she’s wearing a dress that she doesn’t want panty lines for, it’s unsanitary to go without underwear if she might possibly sit bareback on something – if the skirt is short enough or loose enough that it won’t cover her bottom when she sits. She also might want to wear this in case the skirt really is that short to prevent accidental flashing – a la Britany Spears.
June 26th, 2008 at 12:42 pmbut tight jeans aren’t going to show panty lines. that’s the beauty of jeans. plus jeans are cotton. and skirts should really not be so short you can’t sit down. if they are. there is no point in wearing anything. but maybe i’m old fashioned. i like wearing regular underpants that cover my butt cheeks.
June 27th, 2008 at 12:42 amJeans being made of cotton doesn’t solve the abrasive problem. And jeans are not the only item of clothing women wear, so panty lines are an issue in other types of clothing.
It is not up to you to decide how short someone else’s skirt should be. Some of us like wearing short skirts, and some people like it when we do. A skirt doesn’t need to be a micro mini to be “too short to sit down”. When the human body sits, the length between the waist and the knees lengthens, in addition to placing the female genitalia in such a position as to be sitting directly on them (as opposed to male genitalia, which remains up in the lap). A skirt of “reasonable” length, particularly if it’s a loose or flared skirt, can still result in the genitalia coming in contact with the seat or accidentally flashing onlookers when getting in and out of said seat.
And, as I pointed out, it doesn’t have to come in contact with the seat directly to be a problem. Secreting fluids onto the skirt or pants when one sits down is unsightly.
The idea of not showing panty lines is not to make people think you are not wearing any, it’s to avoid the sight, thought, or mention of the panty at all. In “old fashioned” views, it doesn’t matter how conservative your underwear is, it should not be visible to the general public, even as an outline through the clothing.
Removing pantylines is not an implication that one wears no panties. Removing pantylines is avoiding the topic of underwear completely.
November 21st, 2008 at 6:57 pmi guess joreth i just think that doesn’t make any sense. that pantylines don’t imply being underwearless. i understand -that- people don’t think about it that way, but i’ve never understood -how- they could think that way.
that said, of course it’s not up to me to decide how short another person’s skirt is, but the idea of my cooch touching a subway seat seriously skeeves me out. i wasn’t thinking about what people should wear, i was talking about why i don’t care about pantylines or particularly understand caring about them.
November 21st, 2008 at 11:11 pmLeave a reply :