
Man, those sex workers are freaks aren’t they? I mean, selling your body? The body God gave you and your parents loved? Anyone who does that must be mentally ill. Or on drugs. Or involved in violent sex games. Or engaged in sexual contact with children. Sex Workers must be monsters, right?
Well that’s the perception you’d get from the media.
Reading a recent story on San Francisco’s upcoming vote to decriminalize prostitution I was laughing at the ludicrious connections made by the writer.
First, let’s shame San Francisco. The author refers to it as a “live-and-let-live town, where medical marijuana clubs do business next to grocery stores”. Setting the perfect juxtaposition of mundane and scandalous. You can get Wheaties and pick up some smoke? The world has clearly gone made.
Then we get the first of several mentions of the sadomasochism fair. This is actually the Folsom Street Fair, a decades old street fair that celebrates the gay and leather community. It’s also one of the largest fairs in California. All those freaks, right?
The article’s very tone (selling your body) is the quavering moralising that pervades the mass media on the topic of sex work The one quote from Carol Leigh, head of the Bay Area Sex Workers Advocacy Network is framed by two damning assessments from law enforcement. Cause someone who has devoted their life to making sex workers safer doesn’t know nothing about the topic. We need cops, and male cops at that, to tell us about pimps and drugs all those things that are what sex work is all about. Of course.
Putting aside the sarcasm and snark, why bother to pick on this one silly article. Because of where I came across it. The top of the Drudgereport, which is essentially the national media’s crib sheet for the coming news cycle. Pundits on television, talk radio and any number of blogs will link in and spread one more slanted, badly written scare story about decriminalizing sex work.
Here’s a suggestion, you can off-set this mental melange. Donate to SWOP, the Sex Worker’s Outreach Project, or just sign up for information. Give some support to saner sex laws and fight back against the dull drone of scare-tactic media.
[Photo by blackcustard]
Comments
[...] CNN: Basic coverage (read a critique of the piece here) [...]
October 24th, 2008 at 2:28 pmHey, I think this was actually one of the best articles written on the subject so far. The media is the media, and I think this is about as good as it gets.
This was way better than the Chronicle article about how Prop K means Pimps and Pedophiles will be welcome in SF.
Anyway, I also think that even bad press is good press. This article was carried on over 400 local papers, and in many cases this is the first time people are even hearing that decriminalization is a possibility.
Also, it is because of this article that Debra Walters from the View actually defended decriminalization. Can you even believe it?
This actually has a chance of passing here, and I just feel like people need to work their ass off for the next 10 days to do it.
I am getting really nervous.
If you are out there, PLEASE HELP US.
October 24th, 2008 at 8:32 pmOh yay, I can prepare myself for another slew of correspondence from people who read on my blog about my sex-work past (and present, if porn counts), and want to know when I’m going to mention my drug addictions, and all the times I was beaten or raped by my “pimp” and/or clients, and all the STDs I had/still have.
The bit where I explain that the reason I don’t write about these things is because they DIDN’T HAPPEN TO ME will be drowned out by the wailing and gnashing of teeth and sending of copies of articles like this.
Whee.
October 25th, 2008 at 7:51 amHey, at least cops dont do drugs
October 27th, 2008 at 9:21 amThere will be an meet-up next month here in LA for those who want to support and help SWOP, so I am looking forward to seeing what all can be done and talking with like-minded people… it will be after the election, though, so the tone of the get-together could go either way!
October 27th, 2008 at 12:31 pmI’m a Nurse Practitioner and I see some women who are using sex-work income to buy their diabetes and asthma medications for their children. They have four or five guys that are “regulars” and all of them have part-time day jobs (without healthcare benefits) too. I don’t see anyone reporting on those sex workers though. Maybe because that might illicit some kind of sympathetic response for such a job “choice”.
October 28th, 2008 at 4:07 pm@NP:
The media’s image of sex workers is even uglier as it also encompasses many of the biases regarding working women as well.
October 28th, 2008 at 4:58 pmLeave a reply :